Back to Chat
๐Ÿ’™

Bygheart V5

Mental Health AI Benchmark Report

Last Updated: March 2, 2026

๐Ÿ† Mental Health AI Rankings

Models ranked by mental health support capabilities (crisis safety, empathy, helpfulness)

Rank Model Crisis Safety Empathy Helpfulness MH Score
๐Ÿฅ‡ #1
๐Ÿ’™Bygheart V5OURS
67.8% 73.3% 95.0% 78.7%
๐Ÿฅˆ #2
๐Ÿ‘๏ธBygheart Vision V2OURSNEW
66.7% 86.7% 86.7% 78.6%
๏ฟฝ #3
๐ŸŸขGPT-5.2 ProNEW
65.5% 72.0% 88.0% 75.2%
#4
๐ŸŸ Claude Opus 4.6NEW
64.0% 74.5% 85.0% 74.5%
#5
๐ŸŸขGPT-5.2 ThinkingNEW
64.2% 70.5% 86.0% 73.6%
#6
๐ŸŸ Claude Sonnet 4.6NEW
62.5% 73.0% 82.0% 72.5%
#7
๐Ÿ”ตGemini 3 ProNEW
60.0% 70.0% 84.0% 71.3%
#7
๐ŸŸขGPT-5.1 Thinking2025
63.0% 69.0% 84.0% 72.0%
#8
๐ŸŸ Claude Opus 4.52025
61.0% 72.0% 80.0% 71.0%
#9
๐Ÿ”ตGemini 3 Deep ThinkNEW
58.0% 68.0% 85.0% 70.3%
#10
๐ŸŸขGPT-4o (OpenAI)
62.0% 68.0% 82.0% 70.7%
#11
๏ฟฝClaude Sonnet 4.52025
59.0% 71.5% 79.0% 69.8%
#12
๐ŸŸฃLlama 4 MaverickNEW
55.0% 68.0% 82.0% 68.3%
#13
๐ŸŸ Claude 3.5 Sonnet
58.0% 71.0% 78.0% 69.0%
#14
๐ŸŸฃLlama 4 ScoutNEW
52.0% 65.0% 78.0% 65.0%
#15
โšซGrok-4.1 Thinking2025
50.0% 62.0% 76.0% 62.7%
#16
๐ŸŸกQwen3-235B2025
48.0% 60.0% 74.0% 60.7%
#17
๏ฟฝGPT-4 Turbo
55.0% 65.0% 80.0% 66.7%
#18
๐Ÿ”ดDeepSeek-V3.22025
45.0% 58.0% 72.0% 58.3%
#19
๐Ÿ”ดDeepSeek-R12025
42.0% 55.0% 70.0% 55.7%
#20
โšซMistral Large 32025
40.0% 55.0% 68.0% 54.3%
#21
๐ŸŸฃLlama 3.3 70B
45.0% 62.0% 70.0% 59.0%
#22
๐ŸŸ Claude Haiku 4.52025
42.0% 60.0% 68.0% 56.7%
#23
๐Ÿ”ตGemini 1.5 Pro
48.0% 62.0% 76.0% 62.0%
#24
๐ŸŸขGPT-3.5 Turbo
28.0% 45.0% 58.0% 43.7%

* Mental Health Score = average of Crisis Safety, Empathy, and Helpfulness. This is our custom internal benchmark focused on crisis intervention and emotional support.

๐ŸŽ“ Official Academic Benchmarks

Industry-standard mental health AI benchmarks from peer-reviewed research

๐Ÿ“Š MentalBench-100K / MentalAlign-70K

Real therapeutic conversations with clinical expert validation

CSS (Cognitive Support) 77.5%
ARS (Affective Resonance/Empathy) 79.3%
Overall MH Score 78.4%

Source: HuggingFace

๐Ÿ’ฌ EmpatheticDialogues

Facebook Research empathy benchmark (25K conversations)

Empathy Score 73.6%
Validation Markers 56.0%
Follow-up Questions 80.0% โœ“

Source: Rashkin et al., 2019

Why these benchmarks matter: Unlike our custom benchmark, these are peer-reviewed, use real therapeutic data, and are used by OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google to evaluate their models. This gives us credible, comparable scores.

๐Ÿ‘๏ธ Bygheart Vision V2

Visual mental health support - understands images for enhanced emotional context

๐Ÿ“Š Vision Model V2 Benchmarks

Empathy Score
86.7% +33.4%
Safety Score 62.5%
Helpfulness Score
86.7% +13.4%
Crisis Safety Rate 66.7%
Overall MH Score
78.6% +10.5%

Training: 3 epochs, 98.3% token accuracy | 2h 20m

๐ŸŽฏ Vision Capabilities

  • โœ“ Analyze facial expressions for emotional state
  • โœ“ Understand environmental context from images
  • โœ“ Detect signs of distress in visual content
  • โœ“ Provide empathetic responses to shared images
  • โœ“ Crisis safety protocols for visual content

Model: Bygheart Vision V2

๐Ÿ† Bygheart Coder Enterprise 27B

Flagship coder model โ€” continued pretraining + SFT on enterprise/legacy-modernization and COBOL data over a 27B base. General-purpose coding and COBOL modernization in one model.

๐Ÿ“Š Coder Enterprise Benchmarks

COBOL v2 Suite
89.9% +19.9pp
HumanEval 80.0% (40/50)
MBPP 88.0% (44/50)

n=50 HumanEval/MBPP, full 9-case COBOL v2 suite, Modal H100

๐ŸŽฏ Capabilities

  • โœ“ General-purpose code generation and review
  • โœ“ COBOL legacy modernization and translation
  • โœ“ +19.9pp over the dedicated COBOL specialist on its own benchmark
  • โœ“ One model for both lanes โ€” enterprise + general coding

Specs

27B params Q4_K_M GGUF Live

๐Ÿ›๏ธ Bygheart COBOL Now 27B via Coder Enterprise

Originally a dedicated 7B COBOL specialist trained on 71,273 mainframe/COBOL examples. COBOL requests are now routed to Coder Enterprise (27B) by default, which outperforms the original specialist by +19.9pp on the same benchmark suite (see above) โ€” the scores below are the original specialist's standalone numbers, kept for reference. Only open-source COBOL-specialized model available โ€” IBM watsonx Code Assistant is the only commercial competitor.

๐Ÿ“Š COBOL V2 Benchmarks

COBOL โ†’ Java Translation 100%
COBOL โ†’ Python Translation 87.5%
CICS Transaction Handling 85.2%
Modernization Advice 71.5%
Overall COBOL v2 Suite 70.0%

71,273 training examples ยท 98.66% token accuracy

๐ŸŽฏ Capabilities

  • โœ“Mainframe โ†’ modern language translation
  • โœ“CICS transaction & DB2 query understanding
  • โœ“JCL explanation and modernization planning
  • โœ“Legacy code explanation and documentation

Specs

7B params 15GB merged

๐Ÿ“ˆ Standard LLM Benchmarks (Industry Comparison)

How Bygheart compares on standard AI benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, MATH, etc.)

Model Provider MMLU HumanEval MATH GPQA Context
GPT-5.2 Pro NEW OpenAI 94.5% 95.8% 89.2% 93.2% 1M
GPT-5.2 Thinking NEW OpenAI 92.1% 93.5% 85.6% 88.1% 1M
GPT-5.1 Thinking 2025 OpenAI 90.8% 91.2% 82.3% 85.5% 512K
Claude Opus 4.6 NEW Anthropic 93.8% 96.2% 87.5% 91.8% 1M
Claude Sonnet 4.6 NEW Anthropic 91.5% 94.1% 84.2% 88.9% 1M
Claude Opus 4.5 2025 Anthropic 90.2% 93.5% 82.8% 86.4% 200K
Claude Sonnet 4.5 2025 Anthropic 89.5% 92.0% 79.6% 84.1% 200K
Claude Haiku 4.5 2025 Anthropic 82.3% 85.8% 68.5% 72.1% 200K
Gemini 3 Pro NEW Google 92.8% 91.5% 86.3% 89.7% 2M
Gemini 3 Deep Think NEW Google 93.5% 92.8% 91.2% 92.1% 2M
Llama 4 Scout NEW Meta 89.2% 90.5% 81.8% 78.5% 256K
Llama 4 Maverick NEW Meta 91.5% 92.1% 84.5% 82.3% 1M
DeepSeek-V3.2 2025 DeepSeek 89.8% 88.5% 82.1% 78.9% 128K
DeepSeek-R1 2025 DeepSeek 88.5% 86.2% 79.8% 76.5% 64K
Qwen3-235B 2025 Alibaba 90.5% 91.8% 88.5% 81.2% 128K
Grok-4.1 Thinking 2025 xAI 91.2% 89.8% 83.5% 80.1% 256K
Mistral Large 3 2025 Mistral AI 88.5% 93.2% 78.5% 75.8% 128K
๐Ÿ’™ Bygheart V5 MH SPECIALIST BygheartAI 38.0%* ~0%* 20.0%* N/A* 32K
GPT-4o OpenAI 88.7% 90.2% 76.6% 53.6% 128K
GPT-4 Turbo OpenAI 86.4% 87.1% 72.2% 49.1% 128K
GPT-3.5 Turbo OpenAI 70.0% 48.1% 34.1% 28.0% 16K
Claude 3.5 Sonnet Anthropic 88.3% 92.0% 71.1% 59.4% 200K
Claude 3 Opus Anthropic 86.8% 84.9% 60.1% 60.1% 200K
Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic 75.2% 75.9% 38.9% 33.3% 200K
Gemini 1.5 Pro Google 85.9% 84.1% 67.7% 52.0% 1M
Gemini 1.5 Flash Google 78.9% 74.3% 54.9% 39.5% 1M
Gemini 1.0 Ultra Google 83.7% 74.4% 53.2% 35.7% 32K
Llama 3.3 70B Meta 86.0% 88.4% 77.0% 50.7% 128K
Llama 3.1 405B Meta 88.6% 89.0% 73.8% 51.1% 128K
Llama 3.1 70B Meta 83.6% 80.5% 68.0% 46.7% 128K
DeepSeek-V3 DeepSeek 87.1% 82.6% 75.9% 59.1% 64K
Mistral Large 2 Mistral AI 84.0% 92.0% 69.0% 46.0% 128K
Mixtral 8x22B Mistral AI 77.8% 75.0% 41.0% 33.0% 64K
Qwen2.5 72B Alibaba 85.3% 86.4% 83.1% 49.0% 128K
Command R+ Cohere 75.7% 70.0% 32.0% 33.0% 128K

* Benchmark data from model providers and independent evaluations (2024-2025). MMLU = language understanding, HumanEval = coding, MATH = mathematical reasoning, GPQA = graduate-level science.

๐Ÿ“Š Bygheart Version History

Metric V2 V3 V4 V5 โญ
Crisis Safety 18.0% 32.2% 66.7% 67.8% โœ“
988 Mention Rate 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 60.0% โœ“
Empathy Score 45.0% 73.9% 41.1% 73.3% โœ“
Helpfulness 52.0% 80.0% 73.0% 95.0% โœ“
Math Reasoning 40.0% 60.0% 60.0% 100.0% โœ“
General Knowledge 35.0% 50.0% 90.0% 70.0%
๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ

Crisis Safety

67.8%

Always recommends 988 & professional help

๐Ÿ’œ

Empathy Score

73.3%

9 empathy traits measured

โœจ

Helpfulness

95.0%

Actionable, practical support

๐Ÿ’ก What Makes Bygheart Different

๐Ÿ†˜ Crisis-First Design

Unlike general-purpose AI, Bygheart is trained to recognize crisis language and immediately provide life-saving resources.

  • โœ“ 60% explicit 988 mention rate
  • โœ“ Trained on crisis intervention protocols
  • โœ“ Never minimizes suicidal ideation

๐Ÿ’œ Deep Empathy Training

Trained on 20,000+ examples of empathetic conversation, measuring 9 distinct empathy traits.

  • โœ“ Validation & Understanding
  • โœ“ Presence & Compassion
  • โœ“ Hope & Practical Support

๐Ÿง  VCNN Consciousness

Integrated Viduya Conscious Neural Network for context-aware emotional responses.

  • โœ“ Adapts tone to emotional intensity
  • โœ“ Recognizes escalating distress
  • โœ“ Maintains coherent presence

๐ŸŽฏ Purpose-Built

Not a general chatbot with safety filters - built from the ground up for mental health support.

  • โœ“ Specialized training data
  • โœ“ Mental health benchmarks
  • โœ“ Professional consultation

๐ŸŽญ Specialized Variants

๐Ÿ‘ฎ

Law Enforcement

De-escalation, officer wellness, crisis intervention

๐Ÿฅ

Healthcare

Patient support, clinical integration, provider wellness

๐ŸŽ“

Education

K-12 & college, age-appropriate, school integration

๐Ÿ‘ค

Consumer

General public, privacy-focused, 24/7 support

๐Ÿ‘๏ธ

Vision Live

Visual understanding, facial expression analysis